2014 - Team Ratings After Round 24

ChiPS this week felt that the Hawks, Swans and Power did better than could be expected in their respective wins, and that the Dons were also overachievers despite going down to the Roos. Consequently, it lifted the Ratings of these four teams and dropped those of their opponents by equal amounts. MARS, however, as it usually does, rewarded all four winners with Ratings increases.

Read More

2014 - Round 24 Results : (Almost) All As Predicted

Despite a restricted schedule of just four games and tightened bet size restrictions, the three MoS Funds combined this weekend to produce the 8th-best return for a single round - the 3rd-best since Round 14 - and only the second 100% ROI of the season, the other coming way back in Round 1 when the Head-to-Head Fund snared the upset Giants' win over the Swans, and the Margin Fund bagged two collects.

Read More

2014 - Round 23 : Same As Last Week?

The Head-to-Head Fund has again this week, as it did in Round 21, reacted to an increase in a team's Head-to-Head price by opting out of a wager. This week the team was Carlton, on whom the Head-to-Head Fund fancied a lash when it made its first assessments for the week as the Blues were being offered at $2.90. But, come Tuesday when the Blues had drifted to $3.15, the Head-to-Head Fund decided to look elsewhere.

Read More

2014 - Round 21 Results : A Welcome Return to Form

After two successive weeks of losses, both the Head-to-Head and Line Funds returned to profitability this week, the Head-to-Head Fund landing its sole bet on Freo to record a 6c profit and the Line Fund guessing correctly on four of five occasions to record a profit of about the same size.

Those two profits, paired with the Margin Fund's now-customary loss - this week of 6.5c despite a successful call in the Dons v Eagles game - lifted the Recommended Portfolio by 3.7c for the week, leaving it now up by 7.7c on the season.

Read More